The Chronicle History of King Henry the Fift with His Battell

Henry V Very few films come close to the brilliance Kenneth Branagh achieved with his first foray into screenwriting and direction. Henry V qualifies as a masterpiece, the kind of film that comes along once in a decade. He eschews the theatricality of Laurence Olivier's stirring, fondly ...	Hamlet - Criterion Collection Studio: Image Entertainment Release Date: 09/19/2000 Run time: 155 minutes	Richard III - Criterion Collection The third and final entry in Laurence Olivier's Shakespeare triptych, Richard III (1954) is an audacious portrait of a man determined to prove himself a villain. As the personification of evil impudence, Olivier portrays the Duke of Gloucester with such aplomb that he brings the ...	William Shakespeare's Hamlet (Two-Disc Special Edition) Studio: Castle Rock Hm Video Release Date: 08/14/2007 Run time: 242 minutes	King Lear The late Sir Lawrence Olivier stars in this Emmy Award winning production of Shakespeare's King Lear. It is the timeless tale of greed and lust for power, and of a sick old man, his scheming children and lost loyalties. Also stars Diana Rigg, John Hurt, Leo McKern, and Colin Blak...
Richard III This film adaptation of a critically acclaimed stage production of Shakespeare's historical drama stars Ian McKellen in the title role. The setting is a comic-book vision of 1930s London: part art deco, part Third Reich, part industrial-age rust and rot. The play's force is turn...	Julius Caesar An examination of the relationship between political power and personal conscience, Joseph Mankiewicz's traditional Julius Caesar (1953) is a veritable master class for aspiring thespians. As the opportunistic Marc Antony, Marlon Brando delivers the famous funeral speech with pur...	Macbeth / McKellen, Dench (Thames Shakespeare Collection) When a trio of witches prophesize macbeths ascension to the throne lady macbeth pushes her husband into a murderous spree. But once crowned king of scotland macbeth sees ghastly visions fueled by guilt & a new prophecy that ensure his ultimate downfall. Studio: A&e Home Video R...	Much Ado About Nothing Kenneth Branagh's 1993 production of Shakespeare's Much Ado About Nothing is a vigorous and imaginative work, cheerful and accessible for everyone. Largely the story of Benedick (Branagh) and Beatrice (Emma Thompson)--adversaries who come to believe each is trying to woo the othe...	Hamlet Hamlet prince of denmark finds out that his uncle claudius killed his father to obtain the throne and plans revenge. Studio: Warner Home Video Release Date: 02/08/2005 Starring: Mel Gibson Helena Bonham Carter Run time: 130 minutes Rating: Pg Director: Franco Zeffirelli

Great film,but poor color.
I tried three different copies of the Criterion "Henry V." In each one the colors kept fading in and out. This is the fault not of Olivier's film (whose Technicolor was superb) but of Criterion's transfer from film to DVD. Very disappointing!

Highly Subjective Interpretation
This is a highly subjective, heavily edited version of the Shakespeare play. The playtext was cherry-picked to portray Henry as a pure, virtuous, patriotic leader. However, Shakespeare's Henry was very, very different. In addition to his good qualities, Shakespeare's Henry also made political deals with the clergy, executed enemy prisoners (and his own soldiers), threatened innocent people with rape and plunder, and threw his soldiers headlong into battle for highly questionable reasons--all while neglecting urgent issues at home. (Remind you of a certain US president?) Of course, this film was deliberately made as a WWII propaganda piece, so the English king had to be portrayed in a positive light. However, this film is far from representing the Shakespeare play. The color and inventive staging are pleasant to see. Unfortunately, the extreme departure from Shakespeare's text renders this play extremely dated.

Henry V (1944)
Olivier inhabits the role of Henry with dazzling gusto in this rousing, energetic adaptation of William Shakespeare's play. The world was at war in 1944, and the gifted actor/director hoped the Bard's climactic tale of beat-the-odds triumph would comfort and inspire embattled England. Filling shoes once meant for William Wyler, Olivier's direction of his actors and the Technicolor battle scenes is sharp and inspired (with help from editor Reginald Beck). The movie's stylized opening in a re-created Globe Theater eventually gives way to beautifully scenic realism, an ingenious blend of theater and cinema that helped win Olivier a special Oscar for "outstanding achievement."

Unique
I read the play "Henry V" earlier this year and found parts of it very stimulating and other parts somewhat distracting. I looked forward to see the Olivier film version but I was concerned that it might move along too quickly for me to follow. As I sat back to watch the movie on TCM, I was treated to some background on how the film was produced in England at the height of WWII where just about everything was in scarce supply. The many innovation that enabled the film to come off were impression as was the reminder that "Henry V" was an excellent choice for an audience challenged by the strife of war. It was the very beginning of "Henry V" that impressed me the most. We view the play being presented at the Globe Theatre in Stratford on Avon and we view it as part of the rauscious audience. The positive effects of this vantage point are numerous; we get a better sense of the humor when the audience periodically breaks out in laughter, we get a better sense of how Shakespeare wrote in various scenes to enhance its' impact on the audiences of his day (which were NOT the tuxedo wearing crowd that dropped a bundle to see Shakepeare at an exclusive theater),but mostly, we see the players playing to the audience. The major problem with film versus on-stage production is the lack of interplay between audience and performers. The actors tend to ham it up more for the humorous scenes and tighten the emotion more for the serious scenes. Each side of the stage feeds on the output of the other and a well-produced play leaves all with a sense of a common-shared experience. Not so when acting before a camera and that is why I was so impressed with this approach. Eventually the panorama of the battle field leads us away from the audience to the movie sets. I was grateful for the introduction about the play that prefaced the movie because I understood the backdrop to me more of an artistic expression than a cheap attempt to kid us that it was a real background. I suspect Olivier's approach to the play helped to raise the emotional level of the cast. The ability of a leader to command the respect and inspiration of his troops was a major part of the play and it came through very well in this movie version. My one objection to the movie (and the play since this is how Skakepeare wrote it into the play) was the closing scenes. Maybe it was to woo that same audience that shows up again at the end by adding a romantic angle to the drama. However, I felt that "Henry V" was meant to end on the battle field of victory rather than the wedding chapel of a new alliance. I suspose Shakespeare added that out of concern about how it would play in Paris. Oh well, alls well that almost ends well (as well).

Sir Laurence Olivier. What Else Need Be Said?
Besides Sir Laurence Olivier of course, the best thing about this movie is that it alternates between appearing as real and as a play in the Globe Theatre. Only Sir Laurence Olivier could manage this so smoothly and convincingly. That said, it may help to understand what happened before Henry V. Henry IV usurped the crown from Richard II. (Henry IV is of course Henry V's father.) Well, the eventual Henry V had spent a lot of time with rogues Bardolph, Pistol, Nym, and Falstaff (whose death we see in the film). Well, Henry IV faced revolts for what he had done, and he was overcome with sorrow and guilt over what he had done. One of Henry IV's last suggestions to Henry V was to unite England against a foreign foe to help unite them. (This may seem deplorable, but it was accepted in those times, and to some extent still is.) Well, as it turns out, the partially French Henry V IS the legitimate heir of the French throne, but France of course would rather choose someone of lower rank as their king. But France makes the mistake of mocking England and forcing Henry V's hand. This is when the scenery changes from a performed play to more realistic. Sir Laurence Olivier convincingly portrays Henry V's tremendous energy as well as the famous passages. ("Once more unto the breach dear friends....") One scene of horror from the play that is omitted in this movie is when Henry V orders the execution of Bardolph for stealing a mere cross. Moving on, France's plan (in the play as well as actual history) was to let Henry V get so far and then wear himself and his forces out. This helps make sense of the early victories followed by the weakened and vulnerable state of King Henry V and his forces. 4.1 is arguably the best scene in this play. This is the night before battle and Henry V disguises himself and converses with his men. Then comes the battle that is done surprisingly well with the limited resources back then. (And as in history, France's plan to let England wear itself out backfired miserably.) Then of course comes the tastefully funny scene where Henry V meets his to be wife Katharine. SIDE NOTE: In the reign of his son Henry VI, England was to lose all of France except Calais. (England was to hold that one last bit of land in France even in the later reigns of King Henry VIII and his son King Edward VI.) If you like Sir Laurence Olivier in this, be sure to see him as Hamlet in his "Hamlet," as Mr. Darcy in "Pride and Prejudice," and as Abraham Van Helsing in "Dracula" (1979).